| Corpus Refs: | Macalister/1902:68 Macalister/1945:249 |
| Site: | BHILL |
| Discovery: | first mentioned, Windele, J. |
| History: | Macalister/1902, 51: `...the stones are probably utilised for building and similar purposes'. Macalister/1945, 243--244, `Also reported by Matthew Casey, as being an inscription on the lintel stone of a souterrain...it has, however, never been seen since Windele and possibly Hitchcock examined it. On enquiry, I found that there was a tradition of a souterrain having been formerly in the town-land, on the farm of one Cronin, but that it had been destroyed and the site ploughed up'. |
| Geology: | |
| Dimensions: | 1.22 x 0.61 x 0.3 (converted from Macalister/1945) |
| Setting: | Lost (present , missing 1945) |
| Location: | Macalister/1945, 243--244, observed that the stone had been seen by Windele, but was lost by his own day. Macalister/1902, 51: `...the stones are probably utilised for building and similar purposes'. Macalister/1945, 243--244, `Also reported by Matthew Casey, as being an inscription on the lintel stone of a souterrain...it has, however, never been seen since Windele and possibly Hitchcock examined it. On enquiry I found that there was a tradition of a souterrain having been formerly in the townland, on the farm of one Cronin, but that it had been destroyed and the site ploughed up'. |
| Form: | plain |
| Condition: | inc , inc |
| Folklore: | none |
| Crosses: | none |
| Decorations: | no other decoration |
| Macalister, R.A.S. (1902): | --]UN[--]CC[-- Expansion: --]UN[--]CC[-- Macalister/1902 51 reading only Macalister/1945 244 reading only |
| Orientation: | Not Applicable |
| Position: | n/a ; arris ; n/a ; undivided |
| Incision: | inc |
| Date: | None published |
| Language: | Indeterminate (ogham) |
| Ling. Notes: | none |
| Palaeography: | none |
| Legibility: | n/a |
| Lines: | 1 |
| Carving errors: | 0 |
| Doubtful: | no |