| Corpus Refs: | Macalister/1945:154 |
| Site: | BALIG |
| Discovery: | recognised, 1782 Pelham, H. |
| History: | Macalister/1945, 149: `the stone...still remains on its old site'. |
| Geology: | Macalister/1945, 149: `Grit'. |
| Dimensions: | 1.73 x 0.51 x 0.18 (converted from Macalister/1945) |
| Setting: | in ground |
| Location: | on site Macalister/1945, 144: `still on the original site: it was for long buried in the sand, but has now been re-erected on the knoll, at or near the original site'. |
| Form: | plain |
| Condition: | incomplete , inc |
| Folklore: | none |
| Crosses: | none |
| Decorations: | no other decoration |
| Macalister, R.A.S. (1945): | CUNAMAQQICORBBIMAQQ ||| [--] ||| [--]S Expansion: CUNAMAQQI CORBBI MAQQ[I MUCCOI DOVVINIA]S Macalister/1945 149--150 reading only |
| McManus, D. (1991): | [CU]NAMAQQICORBBIMAQQ[-- Expansion: [CU]NAMAQQI CORBBI MAQQ[-- McManus/1991 66 reading only |
| Orientation: | vertical up down |
| Position: | n/a ; arris ; n/a ; undecorated |
| Incision: | pocked Macalister/1945, 149: `pocked and rubbed'. |
| Date: | 366 - 466 (McManus/1991) McManus/1991, 93--94. |
| Language: | Goidelic (ogham) |
| Ling. Notes: | McManus/1991, 51, states that the wording CUNAMAQQI CORBBI MAQQ[I--] on this stone is one of very few examples were parentage is indicated through the use of the possessive genitive, rather than through use of the word 'son'. Also see McManus/1991, 171. |
| Palaeography: | Macalister/1945, 149, hypothetically restores the letters [I MUCCOI DOVVINIA]. He states that not a single trace of these letters survive. |
| Legibility: | some Macalister/1945, 149: `in good condition'. |
| Lines: | 1 |
| Carving errors: | n |
| Doubtful: | no |